| Comment Number: | OL-102023 |
| Received: | 3/28/2004 8:17:55 PM |
| Organization: | |
| Commenter: | gerald Paulsen |
| State: | AR |
| Agency: | Federal Trade Commission |
| Rule: | CAN-SPAM ANPR |
| Docket ID: | [3084-AA96] |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
The most disgusting aspect of spam is that it takes much more time to delete it than it is worth . Often this spam includes subject matter that is not applicable nor of any interest to me or my Wife. I take a personal afront to any spam that targets me as an individule whom might be interested in unsolcited information of any kind. I do not like unsolicted advertising such things that I could not qualify for or that I do not need . IE: am retired and do not need spam asking me to be employed by some one . I do not need an equity loan to send my children to collage. I do not buy drugs off the internet to circumvent perscriptions. I do not aspire to singles clubs. and on and on. I do not appreciate ads that offer free incentives or prizes for just submitting your E/M address as nothing is free and I am sure that these are not either. I feel that any one whom request that their name or E/M address be excluded from lists of any kind should expect this request to be honered. I do not appreciate recieving the same spam E/M from up to 4 or 5 senders. I think the collection of cookies by any one should be considered a vioation of privacey upon the individule from whom these cookies are collected. I feel that the can spam program is weak and needs beefing up to put more bite in the violators ,and to enforce programs that vigorusly punish the spammers.