Comments:

a1 any mail (postal or e) that in some way requests money I consider spam. The subject line should be made to accuractly reflect the contents of the mail. a2 I rely on the senders information as to how important the spam is to me. a3 I suspect there are. However I am afraid that only by reading an e can one really determine if it is an ad. b1 any mail (postal or e) that in some way requests money I consider spam. b2 technology is ever changing b3 and b4 information should be seperated from commercial requests. The two subjects shoould not be included within one sending. c1 the faster a business has to process a opt-out the better. d1 prevent one company from passing information to an other company for the purposes of solicition. Example: This would allow a loan company to aquire credit informtion but prevent a credit card company giving away an address to a long distance phone company. e My feeling on forward to a friend - Friends would only pass on to others something that the reciever might have an interest in. Requiring a forward on is only a way to aquire more address to sent spam to. e3. I feel a valid and current address might cause a spammer to consider twice before sending out his mail. e4. I reley on the from line as to how important a letter is to me. It is my hope that reducing spam will work like the do not call is doing. The traffic will be reduced, hopfully reduce the load on my ISP, speed up my internet access, reduce frustration and give me more free time. Probably more reasons if I think about it. Good form. Almost painless. Would have liked the comments after each question but I can live with this form. good job by webmaster. money well spent. *REDACTED PERSONAL INFORMATION*