Comments:

Re: CAN-SPAM Act Rulemaking, Project No. R411008To the Commissioners,I applaud your efforts to curb the problem ofunsolicited bulk email. However, I am concerned about the proposed requirement for merchants to maintain suppression lists.There are so many problems and costs associated with this idea, and so much damage done to consumers and businesses alike, that I feel I must urge you to consider this matter most carefully.Requirement of the use of suppression lists willseriously damage many of the legitimate ublicationsavailable on the net. My specific concern is for harm to publishers who require permission from the consumer prior to adding them to any list.They're not who CAN-SPAM was designed to put out of business, but this requirement will very likely have that effect.There's also the potential for significant harm toconsumers, because of the problem of properly knowing their intent when they unsubscribe from a list. On top of that, these suppression lists could easily fall into the hands of spammers, leading to more spam instead of less.I was quite surprised at the potential problems thisruling could involve, and urge you in the strongestpossible terms to reconsider its implementation in light of these problems.Finally I would like to add that Spammers in other countries outside the USA will continue to invade US email addresses. The FTC should put more pressure on companies like Microsoft and other software manufactures to develop and support email servers that offer better protection against spammers and hackers. If the applications and the software used to deliver email was better equiped to stop spammers from finding loop holes then we would be able to reduce the number of spammers sending email.I also feel that email servers should be designed to allow and deny emaill access from countries that promote spam. This way you can automatically reduce unwanted spam.Respectfully,Alex RibeiroOntario, CanadaDoing business with 90% of client base located in the USA