| Comment Number: | 522418-07703 |
| Received: | 7/11/2006 2:47:47 PM |
| Organization: | Shaklee |
| Commenter: | Addie Almond |
| State: | MT |
| Subject: | Business Opportunity Rule |
| Title: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking |
| CFR Citation: | 16 CFR Part 437 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
Dear Sir or Madam: I'm writing to strongly express opposition to the proposed Business Opportunity Rule R511993. I understand that the Federal Trade Commission must protect the public from "unfair and deceptive acts or practices." But the rule as proposed would make it very difficult for me to operate my business as a Shaklee Independent Distributor. A confusing and burdensome section of the proposed rule is the seven-day waiting period to enroll new distributors. Most of the people who sign a Shaklee application are consumers of the products. If they wish to later build a business, all they must do is supply Shaklee corporation with their Social Security number of Tax ID number. No additional kit, fee, or application is required. The Shaklee member kit costs only $19.95. This is far less than most consumer purchases, from TVs to all manner of household appliances, none of which require a waiting period. The waiting period is also unnecessary in that Shaklee Corporation already has a 90% buyback policy for productions, including the member kit, purchased by a distributor within the last two years. The proposed rule requires the disclosure of a minimum of 10 prior purchasers nearest to the prospective purchaser. In this day of identity theft, I am uncomfortable giving out the personal information of other Shaklee distributors, without their knowledge or consent. I understand that those who sign up after the rule takes effect would be told in writing, "If you buy a business opportunity from the seller, your contact info can be disclosed in the future to other buyers." This would discourage new people from signing up as distributors as they are concerned no only about identity theft, but also about their privacy. It could also damage the businesses of Shaklee distributors. Lower ranking distributors often are involved in more than one direct-selling company. And providing a list to a potential recruit, who may already be a distributor for a competing direct-selling company, may be an invitation to solicit existing distributors for such other opportunity. Many people enter direct selling to earn extra income for a specific goal, such as holiday purchases or family vacation. And having to wait to receive the list of the 10 reference requirement is an administrative burden. I will need to provide Shaklee Corporation with the prospective distributor's address and wait to receive the list of the 10 nearest distributors who became distributors within the past three years. Each prospective recruit will need a customized disclosure statement. This will result in a delay far longer than seven calendar days before anyone can sign an application. The proposed rule calls for the release of any information regarding lawsuits that allege misrepresentation, or unfair or deceptive practices over a 10 year period. It does not matter if the company was found innocent or not liable. Unless Shaklee Corporation or its officers, directors of sales dep. emplyees, had been found guilty or liable, it does not make sense to me that I'd have to disclose these lawsuits. I have been a Shaklee distributor for more than 30 years, because I like their nutritional/personalcare/household products and wanted to earn some extra income working from my home. I do not sell much, but have been helped by taking the products myself. Thank you for considering my comments. Sincerely, Addie Almond