| Comment Number: | 522418-05582 |
| Received: | 7/2/2006 9:57:21 AM |
| Organization: | CSMART WORLDWIDE |
| Commenter: | GLENDA CUPID |
| State: | Not in the US |
| Subject: | Business Opportunity Rule |
| Title: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking |
| CFR Citation: | 16 CFR Part 437 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
IN THE QUIXTAR PRESENTATION WE ALREADY DISCLOSE AVERAGE INCOME IN A STATEMENT THEREFORE THIS SHOULD BE THE REQUIREMENT. I DISAGREE WITH THE WAITING PERIOD BECAUSE WE ALREADY GRANT YOU MONEY BACK GUARENTEE THEREFORE A RESTRICTION IS NOT NECESSARY. WE HAVE AN OPEN MEETING WHERE YOU SEE WHO IS INVOLVED IN THE OPPORTUNITY THEREFORE THERE IS NO NEED TO DISCLOSE PERSONAL INFORMATION OF OTHER IBOS THAT VIOLATES PRIVACY LAWS. AS FAR AS DISCLOSING MY INCOME THAT SHOULD BE MY CHOICE NOT MANDATORY. DO YOU TELL EVERYONE HOW MUCH U MAKE? TELLING PEOPLE ABOUT LAW SUITS IS TOO VAGUE. REPORTING ALL OVER THE WORLD REGARDLESS OF IF IT HAD MERIT OR NOT IS NOT FAIR TO US. PERHAPS YOU SHOULD NARROW IT DOWN BY YOUR AREA AND ONLY LITIGATION THAT WAS PROVEN TO BE FRAUDULENT. NOT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE DISMISSED. I APPLAUD YOUR ATTEMPTS BUT CAREFUL WORDING NEEDS TO BE IN PLACE TO PROTECT WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY WORKED SO HARD TO BUILD. QUIXTAR IS THE MODEL THAT YOU ALREADY USE TO COMPARE FRAUDULENT BUSINESS TO THEREFORE I ENCOURAGE YOU TO STUDY OUR PRESENTATION PARTICULARLY OUR VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES AND PERHAPS REQUIRE OTHERS TO DO THE SAME.