Federal Trade Commission Received Documents June 24, 1996 P894219 B18354900168 CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 June 11, 1996 Dear Chairman Pitofsky: I am writing in response to the Commission's request for comments on its review of the standard for making "Made in USA" advertising or labeling claims. I urge the Commission to retain the current standard which permits a company to advertise its products as "Made in USA" only if "all or virtually all" of the product is of U.S. origin. I am a strong supporter of companies that invest in American jobs and manufacturing facilities, and I believe that the Commission's policies should encourage such investment. Companies whose manufactured products meet the all or virtually all standard should benefit from the marketing advantage of the Made in USA label. Weakening the current Made in USA standard would eliminate the incentive that such companies have to rely on U.S. manufacturing and an American workforce. The result would undoubtedly be a shift to less expensive foreign sources and a loss of U.S. jobs. Companies which are unable to meet the current Made in USA standard but which have substantial U.S. manufacturing should be able to continue the use of qualified claims to let consumers know where their products were made. Rather than weakening the Made in USA standard, the Commission should continue to encourage the use of modified claims for products which fall short of "all or virtually all" U.S. content. In summary, I believe the Commission's existing rules provide for truthful advertising claims for the range of products being manufactured in today's global marketplace, while providing strong incentives for the manufacture of products in the United States. I urge the Commission to retain the current Made in USA standard. Sincerely, James H. Quillen The Honorable Robert Pitofsky Chairman Federal Trade Commission Sixth and Pennsylvania, NW Washington, D.C. 20580