FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 18, 1987 FTC CHARGES KRAFT INC. MISREPRESENTED CALCIUM CONTENT OF ITS INDIVIDUAL CHEESE SLICES The Federal Trade Commission today charged Kraft Inc. with misrepresenting the calcium content of its Kraft Singles product in its advertisements. Kraft is a food and consumer products company that sells dairy products, batteries, ice cream, salad dressings, and packaged and frozen foods. Kraft advertises and sells cheese and related products nationwide, including Kraft Singles American Pasteurized Process Cheese Food (Kraft Singles). According to trade sources, Kraft's net sales for 1986 were $8.7 billion, with dairy products accounting for $651 million. According to Bureau of Consumer Protection Director William MacLeod, "Nutritional information is important to consumers, but it can be difficult for them to verify. That is why we seek to maintain the accuracy of nutritional claims." In an administrative complaint, the FTC charged Kraft claimed in ads that a slice of Kraft Singles contains the same amount of calcium as five ounces of milk, when it does not. According to the complaint, this claim is false and misleading. In addition, according to the complaint, Kraft falsely represented in its ads that Kraft Singles contain more calcium than do most imitation cheese slices. The complaint further charges that Kraft represented that it possessed substantiation for these claims when, in fact, it did not. These representations were, therefore, false and mislead ing, according to the complaint. The Commission issues a complaint when it has reason to believe that the law has been or is being violated, and where it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. Such action marks the beginning of a proceeding in which the allegations will be ruled upon after a formal hearing. If the Commission's allegations are upheld, Kraft could be prohibited from misrepresenting the calcium or other nutrient content of its cheese-type products, including those made in comparative ads. The company could also be prohibited from making such claims without having competent and reliable scientific evidence. This complaint concludes an investigation conducted with the cooperation of the California Attorney General's office. The vote to issue the complaint was 4-1, with Commissioner Mary L. Azcuenaga dissenting. Commissioner Azcuenaga said, "The public interest would have been served by postponing until next week the initiation of a lawsuit. My vote, however, should not be construed as disagreement with the substance of the complaint." (More) Copies of the complaint and proposed order are available from the FTC's Public Reference Branch, Room 130, 6th St. and Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580; 202-326-2222; TTY 202-326-2502. # # # MEDIA CONTACT: Dee Ellison, Office of Public Affairs, 202-326-2177 STAFF CONTACT: Robert C. Cheek, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-3045 FTC File No. 862 3097 [kraft]