Business Blog
Sporting goods companies: Guard against deception
Some sports fans spend Saturdays on the field. For the rest of us, raising a Big Foam Finger is exertion enough. But we’ve all read stories about the dangers that head injuries pose to participants in contact sports. That’s why the FTC is continuing to raise concerns about possibly unsubstantiated claims for products advertised to reduce the risk of sports concussions.
The FTC just finalized a settlement first announced in August against Pennsylvania-based Brain-Pad, Inc. and company president Joseph Manzo. The lawsuit alleges they made deceptive claims that their mouthguards reduced the risk of concussions from lower jaw impacts, reduced the risk of concussions generally, and have been clinically proven to provide those benefits. (In case you’re wondering if the FTC pays attention to the comments it receives about proposed settlements, we’ve also posted responses sent to people who commented on the Brain-Pad settlement.)
But the agency took the additional step of sending letters to 18 other sporting goods manufacturers, warning them that they may be making deceptive claims that their mouthguards, headbands, or other devices can reduce the risk of concussions.
The letters call the companies’ attention to the Brain-Pad settlement and urge them to review their advertising, packaging, labeling, and promotional materials to make sure they’re not making unsubstantiated performance or health benefit claims for their products. FTC staff ask the companies to get back in touch with a description of the actions they’ve taken or plan to take to ensure compliance with the FTC Act. The warning letters end with a, well, warning that “if you make claims about the performance or health benefits without adequate evidence to support those claims, the FTC may take action to enforce and seek redress for any violations of the FTC Act as the public interest may require.”
If you have a client in the sporting goods business — or if someone in your family plays contact sports — this is an issue you’ll want to follow. Bookmark the Business Center's Health Claims site for resource materials about substantiation.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.