Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Wayne Kaplan
Response/Comments
O.K. W.E.K. 10/1/86

Question

(redacted)

September 29, 1986

Mr. Wayne Kaplan
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition, Room 303
7 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Notification Requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976 (the Act)

Dear Mr. Kaplan:

This letter is to confirm the advice you gave the undersigned during a telephone conversation recently regarding the Federal Trade Commissions (the FTCs) position under the Act, and the regulations promulgated by the FTC thereunder (the Regulations), with respect to the acquisition of assets by a partnership.

Our client, Corporation A, proposes selling assets consisting of a leasehold interest in certain real property and the improvements located on such property (collectively, the Assets) to Partnership X, which was recently organized for the purpose of effecting this transaction. Partnership X has two corporate general partners, Corporation B and Corporation C, each of which was organized for the purpose of effecting this transaction, and each of which has a different ultimate parent entity, as defined in the Regulations. There exists no regularly prepared balance sheet for Partnership X.

A the closing, Partnership X will pay approximately $55-60 million in cash to acquire the Assets about $40-$45 million of which will be paid directly to Corporation A, and $15 million of which will be paid to satisfy certain indebtedness of Corporation A under a loan and a ground lease.

In order to pay the purchase price, Partnership X intends to borrow $57 million on a nonrecourse basis from a third-party lender shortly before the closing. In addition, Partnership X will borrow $3 million in a recourse basis from a third-party lender, and such $3 million indebtedness will be secured by a letter of credit issued for the accounts of the respective parent corporations of Corporation B and Corporation C.

Also, under the terms of the agreement between Corporation A, Corporation B and Corporation C, after the closing Corporation B and Corporation C will be required to make contributions of debt or equity to Partnership X of a total of $8 million within two years of the closing, and of a total of $14 million within 3 years of the closing.

Over the telephone, you advised the undersigned that the FTC takes the position that a partnership is its own ultimate parent entity. You further advised the undersigned that the FTC takes the position that, for the purpose of applying the size-of-the-parties test under Section 18a(a) of the Act, the total assets of an acquiror are calculated exclusive of the assets to be used to make the acquisition. Therefore, since under these interpretations Partnership X will not have total assets or annual net sales of at least $10 million at the time it acquires the Assets, you advised the undersigned that the acquisition of the Assets by Partnership X from Corporation A is not subject to the notification requirements of the Act.

We also understand that the advice of the Justice Departments Antitrust Division need not be sought regarding the matter described above since it follows the FTCs advice on such matters.

Please know that, in reliance on your advice, the parties to the proposed transaction described above do not intend to file a Notification and Report Form with the FTC or the Justice Department in connection with the proposed transaction.

The parties would like to consummate the proposed transaction in the near future. Accordingly, if you are unable to concur with any part of the foregoing summary of your telephone conversation with the undersigned, or if you have any questions or further comments, we would appreciate it if you would contact the undersigned not later than October 6, 1986.

Please also file-stamp the enclosed copy of this letter, and return it to me in the enclosed, stamped, self-addressed envelope, to serve as a record of your receipt of this letter. Thank you for your assistance.

Very truly yours,

(redacted)

 

c.c. (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.