Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.20
Staff
The PMN Staff concurs with your letter, except for exception as noted. P.S.
Response/Comments
I concur with this letter except that we cannot sign and return a copy of your letter P.S. called (redacted) 1:30 P.M. May 1, 1986. The PMN Staff concurs with your letter, except for exception as noted. P.S.

Question

(redacted)

April 28, 1986

Mr. Patrick Sharpe
Compliance Specialist
Premerger Notification Office
Room 303
Federal Trade Commission
SixthStreet and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Application of Hart-Scott-Rodino To
A Particular Fact Situation

Dear Mr. Sharpe:

We are interested in the application of Section 201 of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the Act) to the following fact situation:

1. Corporation A (A) owns 13% of Corporation B (B).

2. A has announced a tender offer for 100% of B, but will accept 50% ownership (i.e. if shareholders tender 37% of the outstanding stock then A will proceed with the tender offer.)

3. As total assets as of 12/29/85 were (redacted) As gross revenues as of 12/29/85 were (redacted).

4. Bs total assets as of 5/26/85 were (redacted) Bs gross revenues as of 5/26/85 were (redacted)

5. Pursuant to the terms of As tender offer, the purchase price for 87% of B is (redacted)

According to our conversation, regardless of whether A acquires a 50% interest rather than a 100% interest in B, and regardless of the total dollar amount actually paid by A for the shares it purchases pursuant to the tender offer, (1) this transaction is reportable under the Act, and (2) the rule contained in 16 CFR 802.20 does not provide an exemption for this transaction.

If the foregoing correctly sets forth the application of the Act to the facts presented above, please sign and return to me the enclosed copy of this letter. If not, please advise me of any misapplication of the Act.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours.

(redacted)

The foregoing correctly sets forth the application of the Act to the facts presented above.

Premerger Notification Office

By________________________

Title:______________________

Date:

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.