Skip to main content
Date

Tags:

Rule
802.64
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
- looking back to the SBP for the 1978 Final Rule 802.64, it appears that the type of entity you are describing was specifically excluded from the exemption: "Partnerships holding voting securities for investment and investment advisers were rejected because no adequate reasons for affording institutional investor status to such entities were advanced, and because the safeguards characterizing the entities listed in§ 802.64(a) do not appear to be present." 43 FR@ p.33504 (July 31, 1978)

Question

From: Verne, B. Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 3:01PM
To:
(Redacted)
Cc: Walsh, Kathryn E.

Subject: RE: 802.64- Finance Company

(Redacted) - looking back to the SBP for the 1978 Final Rule 802.64, it appears that the type of entity you are describing was specifically excluded from the exemption:

"Partnerships holding voting securities for investment and investment advisers were rejected because no adequate reasons for affording institutional investor status to such entities were advanced, and because the safeguards characterizing the entities listed in§ 802.64(a) do not appear to be present." 43 FR@ p.33504 (July 31, 1978)

 

From: (Redacted)
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:45PM
To: Verne, B. Michael

Subject: 802.64 - Finance Company

Mike,

I am at a loss to find anything that expands on what would be considered a "finance company" under 802.64(a){7). Would a limited partnership fund that primarily invests in companies, directly or, along with co-investors, indirectly through an acquisition vehicle, receiving newly issued voting or nonvoting securities in return for the invested cash be considered a finance company? It seems that an investment of cash for newly issued shares or a corporation could be considered as financing. Any advice or links to prior advice would be greatly appreciated.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.